Оценка экспертами
Нацрейтинга
показателя «Качество
инвестиционного портала»
Language versions

Methodology for calculation of rating results

Technique for calculation of the results of rating of municipal entities of Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug — Ugra in terms of provision of favorable investment climate and promotion of competition

1. Technique for calculation of the results of rating of municipal entities (urban okrugs and municipal districts) of Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug — Ugra (hereinafter referred to as municipal entities, autonomous okrug) in terms of provision of favorable investment climate and promotion of competition (hereinafter referred to as the Technique) sets procedure for assessment of municipal entity self-government authorities' efficiency (performance) indices, as set out in the Methodology for compilation of Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug — Ugra municipal entity rating in terms of provision of favorable investment climate and promotion of competition approved by the Board of the Government of Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug — Ugra for investment activity development in Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug — Ugra (minutes No. 26 of August 9, 2016) (hereinafter referred to as the Rating).

Assessment of municipal entity self-government authorities' efficiency (performance) indices (hereinafter referred to as performance assessment) means compilation of an ordered rating of municipal entities on the basis of the list of certain municipal entity self-government authorities' efficiency (performance) indices (hereinafter referred to as the list of indices).

2. Input information for performance assessment includes values of performance indices from reports of the heads of administrations of municipal entities, information provided by state executive authorities of the autonomous okrug performing functions of implementation of unified state policy and regulatory legal regulation in relevant areas of economic activities, information of state statistics authorities, results of opinion polls and expert assessment by business community representatives, leading business unions of the autonomous okrug, consumers of goods and services (hereinafter referred to as the polls).

3. The polls are held by the Rating Operator by way of absentee questionnaire survey. In order to improve efficiency of the Rating indices assessment, it is allowed to perform polls with the use of Internet information and communication network on the basis of spontaneous sample.

On the basis of poll results for each criterion, the total number of points assigned by respondents from the municipal entity is defined, and the number of respondents, that took part in the poll in this municipal entity.

Forms of questionnaires on poll indices of the Rating shall be approved by the Rating Operator.

4. Assessment of the values of certain performance indices in a reporting term shall be on the basis of the achieved level of local municipal entity self-government authorities' efficiency. Efficiency analysis shall be on the basis of indices directly or indirectly affected by activities of local self-government authorities.

Comparability of indices for comparative assessment is ensured by conversion of absolute values of input data in relative indices having unified measurement unit (points).

5. Reporting term for performance assessment shall be the year preceding current year.

6. Municipal entity ranging by complex performance shall be from the maximum to the minimum value (the higher the value, the higher the complex performance of municipal entity local self-government authorities).

7. On the basis of municipal entity ranging results, rating of municipal entities is compiled, in which municipal entities are divided into 4 groups depending on the number of points assigned:

1 group А is represented by municipal entities with favorable conditions for entrepreneurial and investment activity development, high level of competition;

2 group В is represented by municipal entities with sufficient conditions for entrepreneurial and investment activity development, sufficient level of competition;

3 group С is represented by municipal entities with satisfactory conditions for entrepreneurial and investment activity development, satisfactory level of competition;

4 group D is represented by municipal entities with low level of entrepreneurial and investment activity development, low competition.

8. Local self-government authority classification under group 1, 2, 3 or 4 shall be on the basis of the final performance assessment. For local self-government authorities classified on the basis of the final performance assessment under the 4th group, analysis of additional performance indices is possible, the nature of change in which may improve the final performance assessment.

9. Procedure for calculation of the Rating results for certain indices is set out in annex to this Technique Parameterization of Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug — Ugra municipal entity rating in terms of provision of favorable investment climate and promotion of competition.

10. Local self-government authorities may address the Rating Operator to obtain clarifications on the Rating results.